Awful Parts Appendix B. Bad Parts Appendix C. JSLint Appendix D. Syntax Diagrams Appendix E. JSON Index. Today, software engineers need to know not only how to program effectively but also how to ….
Distributed systems have become more fine-grained as organizations shift from code-heavy monolithic applications to smaller, self-contained …. Salary surveys worldwide regularly place software architect in the top 10 best jobs, yet no real ….
Skip to main content. Start your free trial. JavaScript: The Good Parts by. Buy on Amazon. Book description Most programming languages contain good and bad parts, but JavaScript has more than its share of the bad, having been developed and released in a hurry before it could be refined. Show and hide more. Publisher resources Download Example Code. Most programming languages contain good and bad parts, but JavaScript has more than its share of the bad, having been developed and released in a hurry before it could be refined.
This authoritative book scrapes away these bad features to reveal a subset of JavaScript that's more reliable, readable, and maintainable than the language as a whole-a subset you can use to create truly extensible and efficient code. Considered the JavaScript expert by many people in the development community, author Douglas Crockford identifies the abundance of good ideas that make JavaScript an outstanding object-oriented programming language-ideas such as functions, loose typing, dynamic objects, and an expressive object literal notation.
Unfortunately, these good ideas are mixed in with bad and downright awful ideas, like a programming model based on global variables. When Java applets failed, JavaScript became the language of the Web by default, making its popularity almost completely independent of its qualities as a programming language. In JavaScript: The Good Parts , Crockford finally digs through the steaming pile of good intentions and blunders to give you a detailed look at all the genuinely elegant parts of JavaScript, including:.
The real beauty?
0コメント